Due to varying perceptions of the Calvinistic mis-defining of “sovereignty,” several theological systems developed. First is Covenant theology–which teaches that God has determined in an unchanging way, unalterable way in continuity through both the Old and New Testaments; the Mosaic laws still apply, ie. the Sabbath; the Church is spiritual Israel and all promises to Old Testament Israel are being /will be fulfilled through the New Testament Church. In direct contrast to Covenant theology, Dispensational theology teaches God has determined to keep His promise to a particular racial and national people–the Jews. Of the two, Dispensationalism is certainly the one favored by Scripture. While some hyper-dispensationalists have taken the theology too far, “Dispensationalism” is mostly in line with the plain, literal teaching of Scripture. 1. Covenant theology on the other hand takes the sovereignty definition of Calvin and applies it to the Scriptures in ways which make the theology synthetic. The Jews are cast aside and replaced by the Church–something never taught in Scripture and definitely a cause of antisemitism in Reformed circles. 2.
The chief problem with the disproportionate attention given to the Calvinistic definition of God’s sovereignty is the theological concepts imposed upon Scripture. We would all do well to let the Bible speak for itself and not to snap the Scriptures to a man-made grid. Because of the Reformed emphasis on Calvinistic sovereignty, the concept has become one of idolatry. Examine this quote by A. W. Pink.
“The doctrine of God’s sovereignty …is the centre of gravity in the system of Christian truth – the sun around which all lesser orbs are grouped. It is the golden milestone to which every highway of knowledge leads and from which they all radiate. It is the cord upon which all other doctrines are strung like so many pearls, holding them in place and giving them unity. It is the plumbline by which every creed needs to be measured, the balance in which every human dogma must be weighed. It is designed as the sheet-anchor for our souls amid the storms of life. The doctrine of God’s sovereignty is a Divine cordial to refresh our spirits. It is designed and adapted to mould the affections of the heart and to give a right direction to conduct. It produces gratitude in prosperity and patience in adversity. It affords comfort for the present and a sense of security respecting the unknown future. It is, and it does all, and much more than we have just said….”
Any Spirit-filled believer should be able to see the uncalled for attention and value placed on this man-made definition of sovereignty. Reformed theologians have given a Bible doctrine a man-made definition and elevated that ill-defined point of doctrine above all others.
This uncalled for elevation has brought about several erroneous philosophies. Here are just a few:
Determinism - God has predetermined all things to be from eternity past, including the eternal destiny of souls to either Heaven or Hell.
religionism, authoritarianism, absolutism, perfectionism, universalism, covenant theology, legalism,
Fatalism – what will happen is predestined and nothing can change it. (The logical conclusion of Calvinism.)
and finally, Sacramentalism - the sacraments of baptism and communion can incur grace and are mystic experiences of a higher spiritual nature. 3.
So at the end of all this discussion on the right and wrong definitions of God’s sovereignty, how can we use the term “God’s sovereignty?” The term is legitimate if referring to the control of God over the universe, Christ’s lordship, and the perfect will of God. We cannot use the term to refer to men or man-made definitions of God’s character.
As it is almost impossible to use the term “sovereignty” without implying some degree of Calvinism, we must be careful how we use the term and be clear our listeners understand the correct meaning. This term is one only to be used in reference to God; it is reserved exclusively for Him and must therefore be treated with caution and not flippantly used.
I hope this “mini-series” of posts has been informative and helpful.
kw
1. Many conservative Bible scholars debate the concept of the pre-tribulation rapture, due to its later arrival in the 1800′s.
2. Both the Roman Catholic Church and the Protestant reformers violently persecuted and reviled the Jews–blaming them personally for the death of Jesus Christ. As a result of Martin Luther’s vicious polemics against the Jews, Adolf Hitler used Luther’s writings as a manual to implement his Holocaust. Luther, Martin. “Table Talk“
3. The word sacrament means “sacred act that incurs grace.” We know from the Bible that baptism and communion are strictly memorial, pictorial acts of obedience and do not incur grace or involve any mystic experience. This error is descendant directly from the Roman Catholic Church by the combining of pagan mysticism with Catholic dogma ie. Constantinople. Cruz and Gerberding, “Medieval Worlds: An Introduction to European History, 300-1492. pg. 104.”