Recently I unexpectedly found myself in the midst of a King James Version discussion with several college to young adult age people. I have pounded the subject out many times both in writing and verbally and have no desire to continue doing so, BUT the issue keeps resurfacing and is very important, so alas I do find myself in the battle often and rightly so.
There were some interesting arguments made against the King James Version that I found concerning, not only because I disagree with them, but because they are circulated in error (be that malicious intent or simple ignorance, the cause is irrelevant as the effect is the same.)
Here are the main arguments against the KJV per the discussion I was involved in.
1. “If you are for the KJV you are a heretical KJV-only person and hold to the 1611.”
2. “The KJV is too hard to understand for the average 21st century American.”
3. “The KJV’s language (thees and thous) is outdated.”
4. “The KJV English is Shakespearean.”
5. “The KJV mistranslated the Greek on many occasions and is therefore inferior to other versions.”
I wish I could say I had never heard these accusations, but they are unfortunately par for the course. I may be accused of being a tad cynical, but I submit these arguments to be petty, ignorant and false. I don’t mean to insinuate the arguer is stupid or evil, they are most likely sincere but greatly misinformed or uniformed. Ignorance per se is not a malicious term for an uninformed person. Please understand I am not attempting to berate or degrade someone who uses such arguments. I am sincerely a bit disappointed with the professor or “cemetery” that taught them the arguments.
Here is my hopefully gentle and gently perceived response to the arguments:
1. Such a statement is quite unfair and makes a severe polarization. It is quite possible to be pro-KJV without holding to a KJVO position. The difference in the positions is vast and distinct. To sweep them into a singular position is ignorant and deceiving. Sadly it is a regularly employed tactic used by the Wescott / Hort camp most notably in the epic Wescott Hort manifesto “From the Mind of God to the Mind of Man“: that book was the most influential and distorting work of our lifetime.
2. The KJV is rated on a 5th or 6th grade reading level, depending on the child’s pre-education grasp of vocabulary. Great works are never thrown out due to the reader’s lack of education or skill. This is either a testament to the United States’ ever declining literacy rate and the failure of the Public Education System. How can the KJV be considered faulty based on men’s failure to read?
3. The language, specifically “Thees and Thous” are specific pronouns lost in modern vernacular. To erase them is to lose great portions of meaning and specificity.
4. William Shakespeare had no influence on the KJV and preferred the Geneva Bible. The English in the KJV is actually called Elizabethan English and is classified by English scholars and experts as MODERN ENGLISH. That is quite a shock to most, but 100 percent true.
5. (This one rubs raw a personal peeve of mine.) There are two Greek texts. Sadly, most Bible students are taught that the KJV mistranslated the Greek in many places. Such is the teaching of Doctrines classes in most Christian universities; BJU is certainly no exception. However, propagators of this error fail to mention the existence of two very different texts: The liberal, heritically influenced, unreliable and man-made text known as the Critical Text or as the Wescott Hort camp refers to as “the Alexandrian Text” and the providentially preserved, accurate, trusted, proven text, the Byzantine Text, or as the WH camp hates to call it, the Received Text or Textus Receptus.
So in light of that rarely mentioned fact, the KJV does not line up with the Wescott Hort / Critical Text; and thank the LORD! It instead lines up perfectly with the Textus Receptus. So in stead of admitting the KJV lines up with the TR, Wescott Hort supporters say the KJV mistranslates the Greek (their beloved Critical Text.) I do not make accusations lightly but that is deceptive and a lie. Now many who repeat those false teachings have no idea what they are truly saying so I give them benefit of the doubt and am careful not to throw accusations around at them, but Bible teachers and scholars and cemetery professors should know better and at least be fair and tell the whole story.
My conclusion is simple: No attempt of man nor spirit to destroy the authenticity and divine preservation of the KJV will ever succeed. It is the best available translation for the English-speaking people and has stood the test of time, accuracy and men’s vain attempts to undermine the Scriptures and pervert the Word of God.